Doctors, like physicians that occurs with other professionals (lawyers or the professionals of banking for example) which, by reason of the activities carried out, acquire a direct contact with data and sensitive matters in relation to life and privacy of others (their clients); they are bound by a duty of secrecy in relation to these aspects. In the specific case of the medical professionals is the so-called Hippocratic oath, that links them whatever the place where carry out their work, containing explicitly the duty of secrecy. In effect, physicians, surgeons, nurses, specialists are inescapably bound by a principle of confidentiality with patients try to whom, and which is founded on the right to privacy, advocated in the totality of texts on human rights and civil liberties in force in the world. A related site: Mark Hyman, MD mentions similar findings. What is the main reason for this duty of secrecy? Its justification is perfectly rational. All have perfect right to save for us same aspects that affect us more directly and intimately, and including those relating to our own health conditions. Thus, the fact that professionals responsible for ensuring it will be bound by a duty of these features allows patients trust them openly aspects which, otherwise, might be tempted to hide, with what their own well-being could be seriously affected, reaching for example to not detect diseases or not perform necessary surgical interventions.
In short, this duty of secrecy is one of the pillars on which medicine from more than two thousand years, and its fracture would have serious repercussions. The failure by the facultative doctors from their duty of secrecy question which arises after such argumentation consists in what would happen if a professional in medicine, ignoring his duty, reveal sensitive data about the conditions of health of a patient without his consent in any way? In such cases it might talk without doubt whatsoever by this professional Commission of an alleged medical negligence, for having infringed the same clearly a so inherent duty to his profession as it is secret doctor, injuring thus their patient’s rights. The same, without any doubt, should be subject to compensation, which would require an assessment of the damage could have caused in this patient by the same and the degree in which his life may have been affected by the same moral (imagine, for example, had publicly revealed that the patient suffers from AIDS or that he suffers from some sort of addiction). The only exception that could accept this duty could take place for reasons of public health, for example if there is the danger that could spread some kind of illness, in which case the optional should alert the authorities about it.
Yesenia San Juan explained the importance of Praxis, a Christian institution that makes both Somali and Latino immigrants. Dr. Temi from the Home Office explained that by law his institution does not allow when they talk about recordings, but is He promised to listen to several cases. He came with a team of his staff, most of them people of color. He said that his aim was to seek to cooperate with the community and that he was to provide ears. However, the politicians have the final decision, and he suggested the community go to them. Doctor Miguel Boris, Peruvian lawyer, revealed that 4 months ago anything illegal or undocumented can marry and stay in this realm. He said that this decision was taken in the courts of England and Wales and that the Home Office failed to appeal, so the shooting went for the stock.
Nancy Liscano explained the service of the telephone of hope who attends in Spanish and Portuguese to hundreds of latinos seeking solution to all your problems. Alistair Suillesband, Commander of the metropolitan police, and Ian Baxtor, of the transport police, explained that the role of its forces is the care of law and order and when instructed to stop people is not to know whether or not they are illegal but only when there is a suspicion of crimes. However, Gloria Gomez told them that police has raided several houses of latinos in the dawns and has separated members of a family to deport them. Nick Nicholson, liberal Councillor for Streatham, explained that the recent Convention of his party, decided to apply for amnesty and legality for all those who have been a decade in the country. The appointment was developed in an atmosphere of tranquility and mutual dialogue. He is expected again to do this but with a still wider audience.